MrBeast's rise to fame and his charitable acts

MrBeast, whose real name is Jimmy Donaldson, is a YouTube celebrity with over 200 million followers. Despite his charitable actions, some people criticize him for using viral acts of kindness to gain fame. He's been criticized for exploiting charitable acts for fame, such as healing the deaf, restoring sight to the blind, and drawing water from a stone. Critics aren't necessarily against MrBeast's actions, but they believe that gaining personal notoriety through publicity is inappropriate.

As MrBeast's popularity has risen, so has his charitable giving. He has given away millions of dollars through his not-for-profit organization, Beast Philanthropy. Despite his generosity, some Christians hesitate to praise him because he violates Jesus' commandment not to do good things for show (Matthew 6:1-4). Yet, if we genuinely believe that MrBeast's goal is to raise awareness and money for charitable causes, is there really a problem with him gaining personal notoriety in the process?

Of course, as Christians, we must be cautious about what we endorse. While MrBeast's main channel is known for extravagant giveaways, the majority of his videos aren't focused on paying for healthcare or feeding the homeless. I advise pre-teen children not to be allowed to watch MrBeast and suggest that teenagers and adults be cautious. TheEntertainment that we choose to watch isn't neutral, and MrBeast's videos may one day train us in selfishly desiring more or generously giving gifts. While MrBeast may appreciate him as a commendable example of extravagant giving, others may appreciate him as a deterrent to greed.

Finally, MrBeast's rise in popularity demonstrates the cultural influence of YouTube, particularly on younger people. Today's young people envision themselves as YouTubers rather than celebrities in other fields. This demonstrates the power of YouTube influencers like MrBeast.

What do you think about MrBeast? Is he a considerate person doing charitable things or a boastful showoff? Please share your opinions with me!

Read more

Prospective observational study of peripheral intravenous cannula utilisation and frequency of intravenous fluid delivery in the emergency department: convenience or necessity?

Introduction Over one billion peripheral intravenous cannulas (PIVCs) are inserted worldwide each year. Insertion of PIVCs is associated with pain, phlebitis, occlusion, and medication extravasation as well as the risk of catheter-associated infection, with an associated cost to departmental resources. Previous studies have not assessed if intravenous (IV) fluid delivery